[patch] Fix comment typos.

[Kazu Hirata]

Hi,

Attached is a patch to fix comment typos.  Committed as obvious.

Kazu Hirata

2002-07-30  Kazu Hirata  <kazu@cs.umass.edu>

	* fold-const.c: Fix comment typos.
	* gcse.c: Likewise.
	* reload1.c: Likewise.

Index: fold-const.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/fold-const.c,v
retrieving revision 1.216
diff -u -r1.216 fold-const.c
--- fold-const.c	28 Jul 2002 02:11:04 -0000	1.216
+++ fold-const.c	30 Jul 2002 16:37:02 -0000
@@ -2716,7 +2716,7 @@
   int width;
   tree t;
 
-  /* Tree EXP must have a integral type.  */
+  /* Tree EXP must have an integral type.  */
   t = TREE_TYPE (exp);
   if (! INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (t))
     return NULL_TREE;
Index: gcse.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/gcse.c,v
retrieving revision 1.215
diff -u -r1.215 gcse.c
--- gcse.c	25 Jul 2002 18:57:30 -0000	1.215
+++ gcse.c	30 Jul 2002 16:37:08 -0000
@@ -5850,7 +5850,7 @@
 dominance_info dominators;
 
 /* ??? We could compute post dominators and run this algorithm in
-   reverse to to perform tail merging, doing so would probably be
+   reverse to perform tail merging, doing so would probably be
    more effective than the tail merging code in jump.c.
    It's unclear if tail merging could be run in parallel with
Index: reload1.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/reload1.c,v
retrieving revision 1.350
diff -u -r1.350 reload1.c
--- reload1.c	23 Jul 2002 06:21:55 -0000	1.350
+++ reload1.c	30 Jul 2002 16:37:16 -0000
@@ -4321,7 +4321,7 @@
       abort ();
     }
   /* We resolve conflicts with remaining reloads of the same type by
-     excluding the intervals of of reload registers by them from the
+     excluding the intervals of reload registers by them from the
      interval of freed reload registers.  Since we only keep track of
      one set of interval bounds, we might have to exclude somewhat
      more than what would be necessary if we used a HARD_REG_SET here.