6 GCC regressions, 2 new, with your patch on 2002-07-20T23:26:42Z.
Richard Henderson
rth@redhat.com
Fri Jul 26 11:20:00 GMT 2002
On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 01:02:57PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> It causes small performance degradation and code size growth. Perhaps
> it is the register allocator not being able to produce the REG_EQUIV
> note as alias analysis is too weak?
I didn't think local-alloc tried to produce REG_EQUAL (and thus,
by promotion, REG_EQUIV) notes for memory at all.
r~
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list