3.1.1 PATCH: Fix libstdc++-v3 isprint for Solaris 2.5.1

Rainer Orth ro@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE
Mon Jul 15 13:12:00 GMT 2002


Phil Edwards writes:

> This looks okay for the trunk.  Mark's call for the branch.  (I'd vote yes,
> since the bug and this change are only on a single platform, and it isn't one
> of the primary platforms.)

ok, I've Cc'ed him to get approval or rejection for the branch:

	http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-07/msg00594.html

> However...
> 
> > Sat Jul 13 02:15:14 2002  Rainer Orth  <ro@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
> > 
> > 	* config/os/solaris/solaris2.5/bits/ctype_base.h (ctype_base):
> > 	Fix.
> 
> 1)  Aren't date formats supposed to be different than that?

Not really: while emacs 20 and up uses the ISO-8601 format, emacs 19 uses
the traditional ctime format.  You still see both in recent gcc ChangeLogs.
Since I'm still using emacs 19.34, my posted ChangeLog entries are in the
old format, but I manually edit them to the new one when applying the
patches for real.

> 2)  "Fix" isn't a good enough description.  :-)  Please give future readers
>     a few more words than that.

Ok:

	* config/os/solaris/solaris2.5/bits/ctype_base.h (ctype_base):
	Fix print to match vendor <ctype.h>.

should do.  Readers interested in even more details can consult the mailing
list archives :-)

	Rainer



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list