[PATCH] atomicity for mips patch

H. J. Lu hjl@lucon.org
Wed Jul 3 09:58:00 GMT 2002


On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 12:36:54PM -0400, Phil Edwards wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 09:27:49AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 12:15:45PM -0400, Phil Edwards wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 08:49:05AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > > > > @@ -78,7 +78,8 @@ case "${target_cpu}" in
> > > > >      cpu_include_dir="cpu/m68k"
> > > > >      ;;
> > > > >    mips)
> > > >      ^^^^
> > > > 
> > > > Shouldn't it be "mips*".
> > > 
> > > I've only ever seen reports for mips-foo-bar in triplets.  (The switch
> > > statement is only testing the cpu field.)
> > 
> > May I ask where you got this information?
> 
> ...my email folders... ?
> 
> When I said that "I've only ever seen reports for mips," that's exactly
> what I meant.  If other variations exist, okay, great, I'm not denying
> their existence.[*]  I just haven't seen them.

You can do

# grep mips config.sub

or you can take a look at the gcc-testresults archive. I have been
posting results on mipsel-pc-linux-gnu. If you don't know much about
mips, why not leave that to Eric?


H.J.



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list