[PATCH] atomicity for mips patch
H. J. Lu
hjl@lucon.org
Wed Jul 3 09:58:00 GMT 2002
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 12:36:54PM -0400, Phil Edwards wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 09:27:49AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 12:15:45PM -0400, Phil Edwards wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 08:49:05AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > > > > @@ -78,7 +78,8 @@ case "${target_cpu}" in
> > > > > cpu_include_dir="cpu/m68k"
> > > > > ;;
> > > > > mips)
> > > > ^^^^
> > > >
> > > > Shouldn't it be "mips*".
> > >
> > > I've only ever seen reports for mips-foo-bar in triplets. (The switch
> > > statement is only testing the cpu field.)
> >
> > May I ask where you got this information?
>
> ...my email folders... ?
>
> When I said that "I've only ever seen reports for mips," that's exactly
> what I meant. If other variations exist, okay, great, I'm not denying
> their existence.[*] I just haven't seen them.
You can do
# grep mips config.sub
or you can take a look at the gcc-testresults archive. I have been
posting results on mipsel-pc-linux-gnu. If you don't know much about
mips, why not leave that to Eric?
H.J.
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list