[C++ PATCH] Fix spew.c GC ICE

[Jason Merrill]

>>>>> "Jakub" == Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> writes:

> On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 05:50:01PM +0000, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> >>>>> "Jakub" == Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> writes:
>> 
>> > 	(do_pending_inlines): Set last for the last pending_inlines in the
>> > 	chain, chain current processing_these_inlines to it.
>> 
>> Would it would make sense to save processing_these_inlines in struct
>> cp_function?  Maybe not; there doesn't seem to be any precedent for saving
>> variables that relate to the enclosing context.

> It is certainly possible, yes. If you prefer that as a cleaner solution, I
> can code it up.

I think I would prefer that, thanks.

>> > BTW: is the unparsed_text made by snarf_defarg registered with GC somehow?
>> > Doesn't look like that to me...
>> 
>> It's attached to the parameter it is the default for.

> But nobody is ever calling mark_pending_inlines on it, so it is not.

But it's attached to the parameter, which is attached to the function,
which is attached to the class, which is attached to the namespace, which
is attached to the global list of decls, which is a GC root.  Right?

Jason