Unreviewed patch: Typo in c-tree.texi.
Gaute B Strokkenes
gs234@cam.ac.uk
Sat Jan 5 23:51:00 GMT 2002
I sent the below some time ago. Since this one-byte change is
extremely straightforward, perhaps someone could take a look?
--- c-tree.texi.old Tue Jan 1 05:05:41 2002
+++ c-tree.texi Tue Jan 1 05:06:34 2002
@@ -761,7 +761,7 @@
(BINFO_TYPE (y))} is always the same binfo as @code{y}. The reason is
that if @code{y} is a binfo representing a base-class @code{B} of a
derived class @code{D}, then @code{BINFO_TYPE (y)} will be @code{B}, and
-@code{TYPE_INFO (BINFO_TYPE (y))} will be @code{B} as its own
+@code{TYPE_BINFO (BINFO_TYPE (y))} will be @code{B} as its own
base-class, rather than as a base-class of @code{D}.
The @code{BINFO_BASETYPES} is a @code{TREE_VEC}
(@pxref{Containers}).
--
Gaute Strokkenes http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~gs234/
I like your SNOOPY POSTER!!
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list