Clarify rules for testing patches
Gerald Pfeifer
pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at
Fri Jan 4 02:14:00 GMT 2002
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> I'm checking in the appended patch, which is purely structural and
> copyeditorial fixes.
Thanks.
> ===================================================================
> Index: cvswrite.html
> -<blockquote><code>
> +<blockquote>
> +<pre>
> cvs -z 9 -d :ext:<i>username</i>@gcc.gnu.org:/cvs/gcc co gcc
> -</code></blockquote>
> +</pre>
> +</blockquote>
Was there any specific reason for thischange? I'm asking because I
had intentionally used <blockquote><code> instead of <blockquote><pre>,
because overall the former produced better results with those browsers
I had tested.
So perhaps we ought to revert this part and convert the remainining
instances of <pre> instead?
Gerald
--
Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list