Volatile MEMs in statement expressions and functions inlined as trees

[Alexandre Oliva]

[switching back to non-private communication]

On Dec 31, 2001, Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> wrote:

>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-12/msg00542.html

> Ok.

Thanks.  I bootstrapped it again on athlon-pc-linux-gnu, now with Ada,
and tested it again, without regressions.  I'm yet to write some
testcases to avoid regressions and formalize the intended behavior,
but I'm not sure we've reached consensus yet, so I still haven't spend
the time to write it.

Here's the exact patch I'm checking in.  The only difference from the
previously-posted patch is the addition of 2002 in the copyright
notices.

Happy GNU Year! :-)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: volatile-read.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 14258 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20020101/2cae5bea/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me