powerpc patch 2 of 9

David Edelsohn dje@watson.ibm.com
Thu Feb 21 00:39:00 GMT 2002


	Okay, if you agree with the change.  I thought I remembered that
you specifically used HOST_WIDEST_INT instead of HOST_WIDE_INT for a
reason.  So I am deferring this decision to you since this SVR4
conformance improvement was your work.

David



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list