Fix to i386 binarry operation predicates

[Richard Henderson]

On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 07:37:16PM +0100, Toon Moene wrote:
> Could that be caused by the fact that operand constraints are now more
> general and the conditional more restrictive, i.e., that sometimes this
> instruction is chosen when it shouldn't be ?

I wouldn't have thought so, based on the addition of 

> > !    && (GET_CODE (operands[1]) != MEM || GET_CODE (operands[2]) != MEM)"

but one would have to actually debug the test to figure
out what went wrong.


r~