PATCH: Re: ICE in 920624-1.c with -O3 -funroll-loops on vax-dec-ultrix4.3
Richard Henderson
rth@redhat.com
Mon Feb 4 18:23:00 GMT 2002
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 05:35:52PM -0700, law@redhat.com wrote:
> Agreed. As I mentioned, I'm extremely tempted to burn tonight and
> get rid of having a separate insn for the ADDR_VEC/ADDR_DIFF_VEC.
>
> Thoughts?
If you can make it work, I'm all for it.
BTW, another edge case you should consider in doing this is
s390, which dumps the tablejump label into the constant pool.
I don't think there's an integrated sim for that one, but
perhaps faking it via "ln -s /bin/true s390-linux-run" and
checking that the execute tests compile is a good enough
sanity check.
r~
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list