[patch] doc/*.texi: Fix typos and follow spelling conventions.

[Ziemowit Laski]

Joseph, I hate to be a gadfly, but can you explain the rationale here?
Is there an ISO standard somewhere stipulating that incomplete and/or
incorrect documentation must also be misspelled, or that two wrongs
make a right?

--Zem

On Tuesday, Dec 17, 2002, at 11:59 US/Pacific, Kazu Hirata wrote:

> Hi Joseph,
>
>>>> The spellings here are deliberate.
>>>
>>> Should I revert that part?
>>
>> Yes.
>
> Done.
>
> Kazu Hirata
>
> 2002-12-17  Kazu Hirata  <kazu@cs.umass.edu>
>
> 	* doc/c-tree.texi: Restore deliberate spelling mistakes.
>
> Index: c-tree.texi
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/doc/c-tree.texi,v
> retrieving revision 1.38
> diff -u -r1.38 c-tree.texi
> --- c-tree.texi	17 Dec 2002 19:52:29 -0000
> +++ c-tree.texi	17 Dec 2002 16:47:43 -0000	1.38
> @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
>  @node Deficiencies
>  @section Deficiencies
>
> -There are many places in which this document is incomplet and 
> incorrekt.
> +There are many places in which this document is incomplete and 
> incorrect.
>  It is, as of yet, only @emph{preliminary} documentation.
>
>  @c 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------
Ziemowit Laski                 1 Infinite Loop, MS 301-2K
Mac OS X Compiler Group        Cupertino, CA USA  95014-2083
Apple Computer, Inc.           +1.408.974.6229  Fax .5477