PCH patch
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk
Sun Dec 15 13:13:00 GMT 2002
On 15 Dec 2002, Geoff Keating wrote:
> I looked at that part of passes.texi, and decided that since it was
> (a) out-of-date and (b) useless, to rewrite it. It now reads:
Properly, the individual source files should be explained, but their
functions at present aren't particularly well-defined (and some are large
and could do with being split up).
> It's not user-visible. It is documented in gcc.c.
>
> I'm somewhat concerned that we're documenting specs even to the
> current level of detail (and I notice that some of that documentation
> is wrong).
The specs documentation should be in exactly one place - that is, in the
internals manual (not invoke.texi which is where it was added when specs
were documented in the manual at all; the ability to parse specs from a
file should only really be there for the use of libgcj) (and not a long
comment in gcc.c either).
--
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list