Non-call exceptions versus cse

Richard Henderson rth@redhat.com
Thu Dec 12 11:19:00 GMT 2002


On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 05:18:34PM +0000, Andrew Haley wrote:
> This is the case I'm interested in:
> 
>    a = ({ tmp = foo->bar; tmp; });
> 
> We must not convert this into
> 
>    a = foo->bar;

I don't believe this.

I do believe that there are problems in CSE wrt this problem,
since it doesn't use the CFG properly, but I can't see how this
is related at all.


r~



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list