Non-call exceptions versus cse
Richard Henderson
rth@redhat.com
Thu Dec 12 11:19:00 GMT 2002
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 05:18:34PM +0000, Andrew Haley wrote:
> This is the case I'm interested in:
>
> a = ({ tmp = foo->bar; tmp; });
>
> We must not convert this into
>
> a = foo->bar;
I don't believe this.
I do believe that there are problems in CSE wrt this problem,
since it doesn't use the CFG properly, but I can't see how this
is related at all.
r~
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list