typeof woes in symbol renaming, or glibc x gcc

[Mark Mitchell]

> Does the fact that the upcoming glibc 2.3 won't be built properly
> without this patch in GCC, so every GNU/Linux vendor that adopts GCC
> 3.2 and glibc 2.3 will probably install this patch themselves, help
> get the patch accepted for 3.2.1?

Well, OK.

But the GNU/Linux vendors ought to work to avoid this situation; forcing
potentially destabilizing changes on the overall GCC community isn't
the right thing to do.

-- 
Mark Mitchell                mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC            http://www.codesourcery.com