Possible doc/install.texi patch to sparcv9-*-solaris2* section
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com
Wed Apr 24 07:33:00 GMT 2002
From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
Date: 24 Apr 2002 11:24:59 -0300
On Apr 4, 2002, rbrown64@csc.com.au wrote:
> Note that since the Alpha is a 64-bit architecture, cross-compilers from
> 32-bit machines will not generate code as efficient as that generated
> when the compiler is running on a 64-bit machine because many
> optimizations that depend on being able to represent a word on the
> target in an integral value on the host cannot be performed.
I believe this is no longer true since we started using `long long'
for HOST_WIDE_INT for such cross compilers.
In fact it isn't true as far back as when one used to be
able to say "-DHOST_WIDE_INT='long long'" in CFLAGS during
the build. And I know I was doing that at least 4 years ago
for sparc32-->sparc64 crosses :-)
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list