Patch: another set of cross-compile target warning cleanups

Kaveh R. Ghazi ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu
Thu Oct 25 06:18:00 GMT 2001


 > From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hans-peter.nilsson@axis.com>
 > 
 > > Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 16:22:36 -0400 (EDT)
 > > From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
 > 
 > > Tested via cross compiles of cc1 for the following targets:
 > 
 > FWIW, you should use a simulator setup and full build and test
 > where possible, not just compile cc1.  See simtest-howto.html.
 > (I believe mips is broken ATM.)

Agreed, given infinite CPU, disk, clock time and labor. :-)

But I'm trying to test over 40 targets, so for now I'll have to stick
to building cc1 to get it done in a reasonable amount of time.
Perhaps eventually for some of them I'll do more testing.



 > > 	* cris.h (EH_RETURN_DATA_REGNO): Fix unsigned>=0 warning.
 > 
 > (There was a warning?  Ouch!  I though I'd checked -- famous last words.)
 > 

Actualy, IIRC the cris target was in really good shape.  Thanks.


 > IN_RANGE has *inclusive* limits, so change that 4 to 3.  And
 > space before the (.  Ok with those changes.
 > brgds, H-P


Done.  Good catch!

--
Kaveh R. Ghazi			Engagement Manager / Project Services
ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu		Qwest Internet Solutions



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list