[RFA];
Richard Earnshaw
rearnsha@arm.com
Wed May 16 08:36:00 GMT 2001
> Hi Richard,
>
> > I believe this is wrong to the extent that you can't use
> > HARD_REGNO_NREGS on a pseudo.
>
> *sigh* Yes.
>
> > Funnily enough, I fixed exactly the same problem myself yesterday by
> > breaking out most of the code to a new function (in much the same way that
> > mark_set_1 does). Here's my patch:
>
> Great minds think (almost) alike.
>
> OK I withdraw my patch in favor of yours.
>
> Cheers
> Nick
>
Nick,
Do you have a testcase which shows up this failure, particularly on the
branch -- if so, this is likely to constitute a regression that needs
urgent fixing. (I found it while working on some new back-end code, so
can't use that as justification).
R.
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list