ABI change for ports with byte-aligned functions.

[Alexandre Oliva]

On May  6, 2001, Geoff Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org> wrote:

> Can you explain why it is safe for the compiler to assume that some
> bits in a pointer are zero when in fact they might not be?

I can't think of a case in which it would make any difference that
wouldn't invoke undefined behavior.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me