x86_64 merger part 23 - arithmetic patterns

Richard Henderson rth@redhat.com
Sat Mar 24 21:51:00 GMT 2001


On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 02:44:39PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Sore, but it is also better to keep in sync with the 32bit form, so do you
> think I should just kill the extra alternatives or add comment that 32bit
> assemblers require this and we want to be in sync?

Eh, I thought keep the instruction pattern as-is and 
remove the comment.  


r~



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list