[RFA] More gagging of noisy testsuites

[Jeffrey A Law]

  In message < 20010312001110.A31805@daikokuya.demon.co.uk >you write:
  > This catches some more common failures.  I've been fairly careful
  > to get this right, looking at dozens of recent gcc-testresults posts,
  > but that's no guarantee of course.  OK to commit for mainline?
  > 
  > Neil.
  > 
  > 	* g++.old-deja/g++.jason/thunk3.C: Don't XFAIL mips.
  > 	* gcc.c-torture/execute/20010114-2.x: XFAIL x86 -O[12s].
  > 	* gcc.c-torture/execute/20010122-1.x: XFAIL mips, hppa1.1,
  > 	alphapca56.
  > 	* gcc.c-torture/execute/991118-1.x: XFAIL x86 -O3.
  > 	* gcc.c-torture/execute/bf64-1.x: XFAIL x86 -O3.
  > 	* gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2b.x: XFAIL x86 -O2.
  > 	* gcc.dg/20000724-1.c: XFAIL x86 Linux.
Note some of these are *regressions* against 2.95.2

bf64 and 991118-1 in particular are failing due to a change that went
into the tree back in December (I know because I've been trying to nail
it down because they're regressing on the PA too).

jeff