x86_64 merger part 6 - upper halves and constraints

[Jan Hubicka]

> On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 06:55:17PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > BTW the ior/sub_ext* patterns are missing in our MD files. Is there
> > some purpose for that? If not, I will probably add them later.
> 
> The *_ext_* patterns were added as needed.  We never needed those.  ;-)
But still guess that combiner likes them :)
> 
> > ! (define_insn "*movsi_extzv_1"
> 
> This pattern was deleted in the diff.  Mistake?
Oops!
yes - it seems to be mistake.  I've run accross similar case while
cleaning the patch, but missed this one.  Script I made for converison
became crazy I guess.
> 
> > ! (define_insn "*testqi_ext_1"
> 
> No customary renaming of the rex64 pattern here.
OK.

OK with re-adding the movsi_extzv_1 and renaming the pattern?

Honza
> 
> 
> 
> r~