Some syntactic sugar for machine descriptions

[Richard Henderson]

On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 06:15:25PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> > Pretty sure you want a return here.  We're not supposed
> > to put the newline on the obstack, are we?
> 
> The old code did.

True, it does.  But archaeology suggests that was by oversight rather
than by intention.  IMO we should either support \\\n as one might
expect -- line concatenation -- or not support it at all. 

The patch is ok with that change.


r~