PATCH: faq.html, cvs.html, snapshots.html

[Joseph S. Myers]

On Sat, 16 Jun 2001, Rich Churcher wrote:

> [faq-patch]
> 2001-06-16  Rich Churcher  <churcher@ihug.com.au>
> 
> 	* Minor punctuation changes to some titles
> 	* Updated C++ sample code in "Problems with floating point
> 	  computations" in case anyone tries to compile it
> 	* Created "Older versions of GCC and EGCS" section, moved 
> 	  one question to this and added another from FOM
> 	* Removed question from index which is no longer in FAQ body
> 	* Removed questions to do with snapshots and CVS (these 
> 	  are now in snapshots.html and cvs.html, respectively)
> 
> [cvs-patch]
> 2001-06-16  Rich Churcher  <churcher@ihug.com.au>
> 
>         * Added "Conflicts when using cvs update" section from GCC
>           FAQ
> 
> [snapshots-patch]
> 2001-06-16  Rich Churcher  <churcher@ihug.com.au>
> 
> 	* Added text removed from the GCC FAQ section "Snapshots: 
> 	  how, when, why"
> 	* Corrected "base" -> "basis"

I have applied this patch.  Because you removed the only link to
spam.html, I added one to lists.html as well.

Index: lists.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/lists.html,v
retrieving revision 1.62
diff -u -r1.62 lists.html
--- lists.html	2001/05/15 19:29:03	1.62
+++ lists.html	2001/06/16 10:56:14
@@ -246,6 +246,9 @@
 addresses or omitting addresses altogether, there isn't a whole lot we
 can do right now.
 
+<p>See also <a href="spam.html">information about dealing with spam on
+the lists</a>.</p>
+
 <a name="searchbox"></a>
 <!--#include virtual="/searchbox.ihtml"-->
 

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk