On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 12:07:17AM +0400, Denis Chertykov wrote: > IMHO: my previous patch was not correct. > > Better patch. > ! validate_change (x, &XEXP (x, 0), > ! cse_process_notes (XEXP (x, 0), x), 0); How can this be right? You're ignoring the result of validate_change. r~