PATCH: java: suppress java.lang.Object constructor
Alexandre Oliva
aoliva@redhat.com
Sun Jul 22 13:53:00 GMT 2001
On Jul 17, 2001, Alexandre Petit-Bianco <apbianco@cygnus.com> wrote:
> Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> writes:
>> Is it hard to do this in a general way?
>> If the superclass is derived from Object and it doesn't need a
>> constructor, then eliminate more calls? (i.e., work recursively)
> That's a good idea.
But what if the base class is then modified such that the constructor
is no longer a do-nothing? Wouldn't it be reasonable for one to
expect not to have to recompile the derived class?
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list