Unreviewed warning patches

[Richard Henderson]

On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 10:41:32PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-06/msg01757.html
> > 
> > Ok.
> 
> Is this just an ok for the patch in the message?  

Yes.

> What about the patches mentioned there:
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-06/msg01532.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-06/msg01530.html

Ok.

> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-06/msg01528.html

I think this one's already been fixed.

> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-06/msg01425.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-06/msg01424.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-06/msg01422.html

Ok.

> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-06/msg01758.html

+       unsigned int hard_regnum = hard_regno;

This is silly.  Change hard_regno instead.

> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-06/msg01759.html

Ok.

> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-06/msg01760.html

Um, no.  I think I'll look at the warning for this one.


r~