[PATCH] Don't set function's DECL_NAME to an EXPR_WFL

Bryce McKinlay bryce@albatross.co.nz
Sun Jan 21 16:53:00 GMT 2001


Per Bothner wrote:

> If you want to revert my patch I won't object - but I will put it back
> after the branch!

It is my understanding that removing that code may cause GCJ to ICE on
certain illegal code where it would otherwise have reported a reasonable
error. If that's the case, it should definitely remain in at least until
after the branch. The compiler is working better than it ever has at the
moment (especially thanks to your zip/verifier/ggc fixes!) and we don't
want to mess that up this close to a release, no matter how kludgy the
original code is.

regards

  [ bryce ]




More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list