[PATCH] Don't set function's DECL_NAME to an EXPR_WFL

Alexandre Petit-Bianco apbianco@cygnus.com
Sun Jan 21 16:36:00 GMT 2001


Per Bothner writes:

> Well, it looks like the compilation succeeded, and the resuling
> kawa.exe runs.

I just noticed that too. I haven't tried to run it though.

> I still think it is safer to leave things as they are, since the
> code I removed is clearly quite fragile.

When there's some interaction between source and class files, it might
be tricky. I can easily move things in lang_decl.

./A


More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list