[PATCH] Don't set function's DECL_NAME to an EXPR_WFL
Alexandre Petit-Bianco
apbianco@cygnus.com
Sun Jan 21 16:36:00 GMT 2001
Per Bothner writes:
> Well, it looks like the compilation succeeded, and the resuling
> kawa.exe runs.
I just noticed that too. I haven't tried to run it though.
> I still think it is safer to leave things as they are, since the
> code I removed is clearly quite fragile.
When there's some interaction between source and class files, it might
be tricky. I can easily move things in lang_decl.
./A
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list