patch for exception handlers in PIC code on ARM
Richard Henderson
rth@redhat.com
Tue Jan 16 23:33:00 GMT 2001
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 11:58:21AM +1100, Fergus Henderson wrote:
> So does that mean that the exception_receiver part of the patch *is* needed?
Hmm. Thinking about this, my earlier answer needs revision.
AFAICS it depends on what you put in the frame unwind info. If you give
any register, fixed or not, a column and tag the saves so that they appear
in the frame info, then the unwinder will do the right thing.
r~
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list