patch for exception handlers in PIC code on ARM

Richard Henderson rth@redhat.com
Tue Jan 16 23:33:00 GMT 2001


On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 11:58:21AM +1100, Fergus Henderson wrote:
> So does that mean that the exception_receiver part of the patch *is* needed?

Hmm.  Thinking about this, my earlier answer needs revision.

AFAICS it depends on what you put in the frame unwind info.  If you give
any register, fixed or not, a column and tag the saves so that they appear
in the frame info, then the unwinder will do the right thing.


r~


More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list