PA PIC cleanup
Jeffrey A Law
law@redhat.com
Tue Feb 20 21:14:00 GMT 2001
In message < 200102200538.AAA14531@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca >you write:
> While this is a possible solution to the DLT reload problem
> (indeed I proposed a somewhat similar patch a few weeks ago
> < http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2001-01/msg00743.html >), I didn't
> push this approach because I feel this still leaves the reload
> issue with respect to the standard movsi/movdi patterns. For
> example, it seems possible that short DLT references could still
> be incorrectly substituted.
The short DLT memory references are already correctly handled by the standard
movxx patterns.
> I also think that it shouldn't be necessary to lump everything
> but the kitchen sink into one universal move insn. That's why
> I proposed trying to fix the constraints so that DLT references
> don't get substituted in the standard movsi/movdi patterns.
But you're wrong here because you're missing the fact that reload does
not consistently rerecognize insns.
jeff
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list