i386 REG_ALLOC_ORDER tweek

[Richard Henderson]

On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 11:15:49PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> The i386.h is having REG_ALLOC_ORDER, but anyone who would play with
> it will hit the problem that i386.c unconditionaly wipes it off.

I'd prefer we just nuked order_regs_for_local_alloc and
the associated option.


r~