Patch: warning fix
Geert Bosch
bosch@gnat.com
Thu Feb 1 11:17:00 GMT 2001
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001 19:03:11 +0000, Neil Booth wrote:
> I think GCC is saying "minimum" when it really means "maximum".
No, I think this has come up before; it does mean minimum. Read it
slowly this time, with "ISO C implementations" instead of "ISO C" :-)
We might as well get rid of the confusing word minumum altogether.
"string length `%d' is greater than the length `%d'
ISO C%d compilers are required to support"
I use the more informal word "compilers" here instead of "implementations",
as this will be clearer to most users and is a bit shorter as well.
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list