fix sparc peephole2 predicates
Jakub Jelinek
jakub@redhat.com
Thu Dec 20 01:04:00 GMT 2001
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 09:23:13AM +0100, Lars Brinkhoff wrote:
> Dan Nicolaescu <dann@godzilla.ICS.UCI.EDU> writes:
> > ! Also iff dependent_reg_rtx is not null it should not be used to
> > ! compute the address for mem1, i.e. we cannot optimize a sequence
> > ! like:
> > ! ld [%o0], %o0
> > ! ld [%o0 + 4], %o1
> > ! to
> > ! ldd [%o0], o0
>
> Missing % before the last o0.
Fixed. Thanks.
Jakub
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list