fix sparc peephole2 predicates

Jakub Jelinek jakub@redhat.com
Thu Dec 20 01:04:00 GMT 2001


On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 09:23:13AM +0100, Lars Brinkhoff wrote:
> Dan Nicolaescu <dann@godzilla.ICS.UCI.EDU> writes:
> > !    Also iff dependent_reg_rtx is not null it should not be used to
> > !    compute the address for mem1, i.e. we cannot optimize a sequence
> > !    like:
> > !    	ld [%o0], %o0
> > ! 	ld [%o0 + 4], %o1
> > !    to
> > !    	ldd [%o0], o0
> 
> Missing % before the last o0.

Fixed. Thanks.

	Jakub



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list