rtx_unchanging_p vs c++ vtable fields

[Richard Henderson]

On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 06:07:04AM -0500, Richard Kenner wrote:
> I'm pretty sure I know what's wrong, but I'm a trifle behind
> right now.  I think it's as simple as the wrong modifier being passed
> to expand_expr or the wrong tree be passed into the test.

Well the thing is, even if you come up with something to fix this
one case, I no longer have any confidence in the consistency of
usage of RTX_UNCHANGING_P throughout the compiler.

I really think we'll be better off removing it sooner than later.


r~