PATH: check definite unassigment to final variables

Tom Tromey tromey@redhat.com
Thu Dec 6 15:53:00 GMT 2001


>>>>> "Per" == Per Bothner <per@bothner.com> writes:

Per> Actually, we do violate the rules in at least one area: The extra
Per> complication dealing with loop statements discussed in the JLS.

This probably won't matter in practice, but it will show up if/when we
start running Jacks against gcj.

Per> That will uncover at least one regression: With the new algorithm
Per> libjava.compile/BlankFinal.java now fails where it didn't use
Per> to. That is because the testcase is wrong - the compiler really
Per> *should* reject the program.  Tom, you checked the testcase in -
Per> I don't know what you want to do about it - change it to a
Per> "non-compile" testcase?

We can just delete it.  I can do that if you'd like.

Tom



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list