What is Happening with g++.dg/opt/alias1.C?

Jason Merrill jason_merrill@redhat.com
Wed Aug 8 03:01:00 GMT 2001


>>>>> "Jeffrey" == Jeffrey Oldham <oldham@codesourcery.com> writes:

> For gcc 3.1, gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/alias1.C was created today, but
> I could not find any message sent to gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org and no
> entry in gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.  Did I miss them?

You missed the message to gcc-patches, entitled "PATCH to get_alias_set".
Unfortunately, the regression tester showed 19 new failures in the g77
testsuite with the patch, so I reverted it until I could determine what the
problem was.  I didn't think to XFAIL the new test in the meantime, sorry.

I never add entries to the testsuite ChangeLog for new tests; it seems
pointless.  I asked Mark for his thoughts on the subject, and he concurs.

> The cvs log file is:

>     ----------------------------
>     revision 1.2
>     date: 2001/08/07 12:54:10;  author: jason;  state: Exp;  lines: +1 -1
>     oops
>     ----------------------------
>     revision 1.1
>     date: 2001/08/07 11:13:54;  author: jason;  state: Exp;
> 	    * alias.c (get_alias_set): Return a previously calculated
> 	    alias set for a VAR_DECL.

> What do these entries mean?

The 1.1 entry indicates the patch which fixes the testcase.  The 1.2 entry
is me fixing a syntax error in the dg-options line.

> For mips-sgi-irix6.5 3.1, alias1's execution fails.  Is this to be
> expected?

Until the patch is applied again, yes.

Jason



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list