`make install` should install the info files in java

[Joseph S. Myers]

On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Bryce McKinlay wrote:

> Tom Tromey wrote:
> 
> > Alex> Do we need to write a fastjar.texi? I can do that -- it's
> > Alex> probably a good idea anyways.
> >
> > Right now we install fastjar.  However, I don't think we should.
> > We really should only use it when building.
> 
> Why not? The JDK provides a jar utility, I don't see a reason why we
> shouldn't, except that it might be nicer to have out own "jar" written
> in Java which excercises the java.util.jar implementation in libgcj.

In any case, since fastjar is a third party utility imported into the
tree, surely documenting it is the responsibility of its maintainers
outside of GCC.  If they add documentation in a future version, then we
should install it if we install fastjar.  Of course if GCC had its own
jar, then that would be GCC's responsibility to document (probably in
gcj.texi).

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk