[Proposed binutils PATCH] Re: Diagnosing an intricate C++ problem

[Marc Espie]

In article < 20000905121906.D10431@dragon.nuxi.com > you write:
>Jeff Law tries to do a little bit of work on that branch, but the other
>GCC committers need to help him out to make any real branch maintenance
>take place.  C++ in 2.95.2 is so bad that I know many C++ that have had
>to move the Russian Roulette game of 2.96 to get a [sometimes] working
>compiler.

As far as I could tell, the gcc 2.95 branch works reasonably well for C++.
The code it outputs is definitely not perfect, but at least it seems to
compile reasonable C++ code with no errors.

I'd be interested in particulars, maybe we can try to improve the 2.95
branch quality ?