Patch to projects.html: glibc's string function macros

Richard Henderson
Mon Oct 30 14:43:00 GMT 2000

On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 01:34:10PM -0500, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> 1.  Shouldn't that be "return expand_expr(...)" (emphasis on "return")
>     in expand_builtin_va_end?


> 3.  It doesn't matter in this case, but supposing there was more than
>     one argument with side-effects, how do I chain together several
>     rtx'es?

You don't.  You expand the expression and throw away the
result.  If the thing really had side effects, then it
added bits to the instruction stream.


More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list