Patch to projects.html: glibc's string function macros

Richard Henderson rth@cygnus.com
Mon Oct 30 14:43:00 GMT 2000


On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 01:34:10PM -0500, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> 1.  Shouldn't that be "return expand_expr(...)" (emphasis on "return")
>     in expand_builtin_va_end?

No.

> 3.  It doesn't matter in this case, but supposing there was more than
>     one argument with side-effects, how do I chain together several
>     rtx'es?

You don't.  You expand the expression and throw away the
result.  If the thing really had side effects, then it
added bits to the instruction stream.


r~


More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list