overridden optional reload may cause a needed reload to be dropped

Alexandre Oliva aoliva@redhat.com
Thu Oct 26 00:30:00 GMT 2000


On Oct 25, 2000, Bernd Schmidt <bernds@redhat.co.uk> wrote:

> If reload 1 isn't inherited, then we shouldn't have come to that piece
> of code as far as I can tell.

Maybe that's the source of the problem, then.  Maybe we should test
for reload_inherited before calling remove_address_replacements?  In
this case, even though reload_inherited[1] is 0, reload_override_in[1]
is (reg:SF fpul), and so are check_reg and rld[1].in.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me


More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list