[PATCH] Avoid segfaulting in {start,finish}_decl

Jim Wilson wilson@cygnus.com
Sat Oct 21 17:29:00 GMT 2000

In article < 20001021023205.G6207@devserv.devel.redhat.com > you write:
>while with Jim's patch it does not print the last error.
>So the question is whether we want to put that error (to stay consistent
>with previous releases) or not.

I deliberately disabled printing of that error message.  The program only
has one error, so it is wrong to print two error messages for it.


More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list