CodeSourcery's online test compilation
Thu Oct 12 07:56:00 GMT 2000
On 12 Oct 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> How about this patch?
Yes, this is nice!
Please also have a look at HP's remarks, but apart from that and the
following minor nits, the changes are fine -- and most welcome!
! <p>Before you report a bug, please check the <a href="#known">list of
! well-known bugs</a> and try <a
! href=" http://www.codesourcery.com/gcc-compile.shtml ">CodeSourcery's
! Online Test Compilation</a>
"...and try a current snapshot of GCC or CodeSourcery's..."
! (if you do, please mention in your report
! the GCC version displayed in that web-page)
"on that web-page"? (Or better, just skip it, as the request for the
version is repeated later anyways.)
+ <li>An attachment containing all (or some :-) of the above</li>
Isn't this essentially redundant?
+ <li>Bugs in the assembler, the linker or the C library; these are
+ separate projects, with separate mailing lists and different bug
+ reporting procedures</li>
Full stop. (Also in some other <li>s.)
+ <li>Bugs in releases or snapshots of GCC not issued by the Free
+ Software Foundation; report them to whoever provided you with the
I believe s/Free Software Foundation/GNU project/, but I'll ask RMS...
! <p>The gcc lists have message size limits (200 kbytes) and bug reports
! over those limits will currently be bounced. If your bug is larger
! than that, please post it directly in GNATS.</p>
The change above is one I had in mind! Yup. :-)
Thanks a lot!
More information about the Gcc-patches