SH: use register names instead of numbers

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Nov 22, 2000, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Nov 22, 2000, Joern Rennecke <amylaar@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> But what if I want to refer to the constants #defined in insn-codes.h
>>> in machine-specific header files?  There are at least half a dozen C
>>> sources that currently fall victim of this problem in the new set-up.
>>> Should I just add insn-codes.h to the list of machine-specific headers
>>> (which might result in some cyclic dependency), or can someone come up

>> Is there indeed a cyclic dependency?
>> I thought that insn-codes.h is built without needing tm.h ?

> There appears to be.  Most xm-*.h include tm.h.
> Houston, we have a problem :-)

Ok, copying the constants from insn-codes.h to insn-config.h covers
most of the programs that had failed to compile, and insn-config.h
even makes sense for constants.  But resource.c and rtlanal.c still
won't compile unless I explicitly #include "insn-config.h".  Does this
sound reasonable?

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me