arm constant pool problems

[Richard Earnshaw]

> On 18 Sep, you wrote:
> 
> >I'm not saying the above is wrong, but I don't think it should be needed: 
> >the neg_pool_range attribute value should already take this into account 
> >(note that they are all slightly less than the maximum value).  I'll have 
> >a look at this, but it won't be soon since I'm going to be out of the 
> >office for most of the next two weeks.
> 
> Did you ever get a chance to look at this?
> 
> p.
> 
> 

Ah, no, I'd forgotten about it.  Could you file a PR please.

R.