c++ language question

mark@codesourcery.com mark@codesourcery.com
Tue Nov 7 16:37:00 GMT 2000


Does this actually buy us much?  (I.e., were there conforming programs that didn't work before, but will work now?)

I'm afraid that will simply screw up people who have typedef's for wchar_t in their header files, without helping them much.  Jason?

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com


----- Original Message -----
Sent   : 11/7/00 4:33 PM
>From   : Eric Christopher <echristo@cygnus.com>
To     : gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++ language question

> This time to the correct address
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: c++ language question
> Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2000 16:27:41 -0800
> From: Eric Christopher <echristo@cygnus.com>
> To: Mike Stump <mrs@windriver.com>
> CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> References: <200011070240.SAA19233@kankakee.wrs.com>
> and here's the patch:
> comments?  First time in the c++ front end so I'm still feeling my way
> out.
> -eric
> 2000-11-07  Eric Christopher  <echristo@redhat.com>
> 	* decl.c (init_decl_processing): Change definition of
> 	__wchar_t to wchar_t.  Remove artificial declaration of
> 	wchar_t.
> 	* lex.c: Change instances of __wchar_t to wchar_t.


____________________________________________________

Get MORE than just FREE e-mail. Get a private Web office.
Organize your team with FREE communication and
collaboration tools from HotOffice(R) at  www.hotoffice.com.


More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list