[PATCH] Fix crash27.C and crash29.C testcases
Bernd Schmidt
bernds@redhat.co.uk
Tue Nov 7 02:05:00 GMT 2000
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Theodore Papadopoulo wrote:
>
> mark@codesourcery.com said:
> > This is why we are writing a new parser. Of course, that won't help
> > before 3.0. I'm somewhat tempted just to ignore these kinds of bugs
> > for 3.0, rather than complicate the code with a lot of gunk that we'll
> > then want to remove later -- but that's perhaps irresponsible. It
> > would be great if Jason Merill would comment.
>
> Just my 0.00000002c (the simple user view):
>
> 1) Ignoring these kinds of bugs will give the impression that g++-3.0 is
> not a good compiler because it crashes very often (even if it happens
> most often after a syntax error). I'm not sure this is good in terms
> of "public image". All the more that so much good work has been done,
> it would be a pity to destroy the its "image" in this way...
Didn't we have a hack once that turned all ICEs into a friendlier message
("confused by earlier errors, bailing out") if an error in the input was
encountered before?
Bernd
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list