64-bit mn10300 prologue bug

[Alexandre Oliva]

On May 18, 2000, Jeffrey A Law <law@cygnus.com> wrote:

>   In message < orya57mzp7.fsf@saci.lsd.ic.unicamp.br >you write:

>> While I was at it, I modified some types so that we'll get correct
>> code on 16-bit hosts, as well as 32-bit and 64-bit ones.

> Wouldn't it make more sense to make size an "unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT"?

As rth pointed out, HOST_WIDE_INT (signed) makes even more sense :-)

> If that works, consider it approved.

Here's what I'm checking in: