ACCUMULATE_OUTGOING_ARGS as runtime argument take 2

Jeffrey A Law law@cygnus.com
Wed Mar 29 12:37:00 GMT 2000


  In message < 200003291718.MAA06886@caip.rutgers.edu >you write:
  >  > From: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
  >  > 
  >  > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 09:48:11PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
  >  > > > Here is updated version of my patch to turn
  >  > > > ACCUMULATE_OUTGOING_ARGS to an runtime option.  It now contains
  >  > > > all necesarry changes to backends.  It bootstraps on i386 in
  >  > > > all three modes, passes regression tests and bootstraps on m68k
  >  > > > (with some unreleated tweaking of current CVS tree).
  >  > > 
  >  > > Ok.
  >  > 
  >  > Thanks for the really exceptional patience while reading this patch.
  > 
  > 
  > I got an error in stage1 calls.c on Irix6:
  > 
  >  > "../../egcs-CVS20000329/gcc/calls.c", line 2694: error(1018):
  >  >					 expected a ")"
  >  >           must_preallocate == 0 && reg_parm_stack_space > 0)
  >  >           ^
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > Is this what you meant?
  > 
  > 
  > 2000-03-29  Kaveh R. Ghazi  <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
  > 
  > 	* calls.c (expand_call): Fix typo in last change.
I believe so.  I've got a PA bootstrap running right now with that change and
will check it in along with my fix to stmt.c when testing wraps up.

jeff



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list