ACCUMULATE_OUTGOING_ARGS as runtime argument take 2
Jeffrey A Law
Wed Mar 29 12:37:00 GMT 2000
In message < 200003291718.MAA06886@caip.rutgers.edu >you write:
> > From: Jan Hubicka <email@example.com>
> > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 09:48:11PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > > > Here is updated version of my patch to turn
> > > > ACCUMULATE_OUTGOING_ARGS to an runtime option. It now contains
> > > > all necesarry changes to backends. It bootstraps on i386 in
> > > > all three modes, passes regression tests and bootstraps on m68k
> > > > (with some unreleated tweaking of current CVS tree).
> > >
> > > Ok.
> > Thanks for the really exceptional patience while reading this patch.
> I got an error in stage1 calls.c on Irix6:
> > "../../egcs-CVS20000329/gcc/calls.c", line 2694: error(1018):
> > expected a ")"
> > must_preallocate == 0 && reg_parm_stack_space > 0)
> > ^
> Is this what you meant?
> 2000-03-29 Kaveh R. Ghazi <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> * calls.c (expand_call): Fix typo in last change.
I believe so. I've got a PA bootstrap running right now with that change and
will check it in along with my fix to stmt.c when testing wraps up.
More information about the Gcc-patches