ARM: Invalid Stack Alignment BUG

[Richard Earnshaw]

> 
>   In message < 200003131602.QAA16283@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com >you write:
>   > Craig,
>   > 
>   > Thanks for looking into this.  However, I'm not convinced that it correct 
>   > to fix this in the back end (as I think you are implying).  I haven't 
>   > checked in detail but my gut feeling is that if the stack-frame is 
>   > unaligned during reload, then unallocated pseudos may get pushed at 
>   > unaligned addresses, which could cause all sorts of carnage.
>   > 
>   > Jan, why does cfun->stack_alignment_needed not have a minimum value of 
>   > STACK_BOUNDARY?
> Agreed.  I can't think of any case where stack_alignment_needed should be
> less than STACK_BOUNDARY.
> 
Good.  Following patch applied.

2000-03-14  Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>

	* function.c (prepare_function_start): Correctly initialize
	cfun->stack_alignment_needed.